Formula-1 Management (FOM) has recently expressed strong criticism of FIA President Jean Todt and FIA Vice President Ben Sulayem, raising questions about the future of the sport. FOM, which is responsible for the commercial rights of Formula-1, accused Todt and Sulayem of lacking transparency and acting in their own self-interest.

The tension between FOM and the FIA has been brewing for some time, with FOM accusing the FIA of not doing enough to promote the sport and of being too focused on their own interests. The recent criticism from FOM is significant, as it highlights the growing divide between the two organizations and the potential for a major rift in the sport.

The implications of this tension are significant for the future of Formula-1. If FOM and the FIA are not able to resolve their differences and work together, it could lead to a decline in the popularity and financial success of the sport. This is a concern for fans, teams, sponsors, and other stakeholders in the sport.

Additionally, this tension may also affect the decision-making process of the sport, as FOM and FIA have different priorities and strategies. FOM’s focus is on the commercial side of the sport, while the FIA’s focus is on ensuring safety and fair competition. If the two organizations are not able to find common ground, it could lead to conflicting decisions and a lack of direction for the sport.

One possible solution to this issue is for FOM and the FIA to work together more closely and find ways to address their differences. This could involve increased communication and collaboration, as well as the establishment of a joint working group to address specific issues. It could also involve a review of the current governance structure of the sport, with the aim of finding a more effective and efficient way of managing Formula-1.